Donald Trump is seriously considering running as a presidential candidate for the 2012 election. Trump is appalled of the current leadership of the United States. He strongly believes he can do a much better job. Trump is showing signs of being a productive narcissist under Psychodynamic Leadership. Based on table 12.1 from the Leadership book by Northouse, he has many of the strengths and one weakness of a productive narcissist. Trump is passionate, an independent thinker and risk taker, and a visionary to change the U.S. and create meaning for the people of the U.S. However, he shows only one weakness of a productive narcissist: he can become a little angry and demonstrate criticism.
Trump has passion to reshape the financial state of the country. He would like to control the oil in Iraq and eventually pay back countries that the United States owes money to. Trump is an independent think and risk taker. The way Trump has become a successful businessman is by being independent and a risk taker. He has the vision to change the United States. Trump envisions controlling the foreign oil in Iraq and possibly Libya to make profit for the United States. He will use the power of the U.S. military to account for controlling the oil. Trump made the comment that if the U.S. pulls out of Iraq, Iran will come in and take over all the oil fields. He does not want Iran to come in and take over.
What are your thoughts about Trump's leadership ability? Would he make a good president? What other leadership approaches would fit well in this case?
http://online.wsj.com/video/trump-as-independent-in-2012/75187604-AAA1-4A45-AC20-E3030EC5D45F.html
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Monday, April 11, 2011
Chef Bouley
French chef David Bouley is looking to open up a Japanese restaurant in TriBeCa, NY. Based on the intrapersonal perspective of Authentic Leadership in table 10.1, chef Bouley is exhibiting genuine leadership, leading from conviction, being original, and basing his actions on his values. Bouley's genuine leadership comes from his personal desire and deep wanting to open a Japanese restaurant.
He conceived the idea of opening a Japanese restaurant seven years ago and has been wanting to open one ever since. However, due to the recession, he has been unable to. Bouley feels convicted build an empire of restaurants. He wants to name Bouley a name customers can trust when they go to his restaurant(s). Then, chef Bouley wants to be original with his cooking. He does not want his food to be sub-par or a copy of another restaurant's. Chef Bouley values business, but he also values the people he serves. He would like to continue to serve the people by opening a Japanese restaurant.
What other leadership approach could Chef Bouley be portraying in this case? I did consider Contingency Theory with Bouley being the right man for opening a new restaurant.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704641604576254913855945024.html?mod=WSJ_NY_MIDDLETopStories
Posted by: Aaron Barton
He conceived the idea of opening a Japanese restaurant seven years ago and has been wanting to open one ever since. However, due to the recession, he has been unable to. Bouley feels convicted build an empire of restaurants. He wants to name Bouley a name customers can trust when they go to his restaurant(s). Then, chef Bouley wants to be original with his cooking. He does not want his food to be sub-par or a copy of another restaurant's. Chef Bouley values business, but he also values the people he serves. He would like to continue to serve the people by opening a Japanese restaurant.
What other leadership approach could Chef Bouley be portraying in this case? I did consider Contingency Theory with Bouley being the right man for opening a new restaurant.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704641604576254913855945024.html?mod=WSJ_NY_MIDDLETopStories
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Bob Dylan plays his first gig in Vietnam
This article talked about how Bob Dylan plays his first gig in Vietnam. Its ironic since his music was played during the 1960's when the U.S. was at war with Vietnam, and many of his songs where anti-war/protest songs. It reminded me of path goal-theory since he was not able to play in the country for many years due to the communist government placing restrictions on the music that they listen to. Big name concerts in that part of the world are rare, because of communist censors. There was a obstacle blocking the people of east Asia from hearing his music but through negotiations and a pre- approved set list He was able to play for the Vietnamese. He was also able to play in china something he had not done before either but in China he had to have censors in play for some of his songs. By removing the obstacles imposed by the government he was able to play his music in places that in his long career he has not played at before.
What other theory we learned about could apply here?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13029109
Posted by-Greg Pawlowski
What other theory we learned about could apply here?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13029109
Posted by-Greg Pawlowski
Mitt Romney's Presidential Push
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42540300/ns/politics-decision_2012/42542232
Mitt Romney is making his case for a second run at the White House after falling short in 2008 to gain the GOP nomination. The leadership theory I am using to analyze this article is the Skills approach. Romney has developed numerous skills through his years as a businessman that he thinks will be beneficial to help give the economy the jump start it needs. As stated in the article, he has a knack for turning around things that are failing. The skills model starts with individual attributes. The first attribute to look at is general cognitive ability. Romney has not gotten to this point in his life without having intelligence. He is a businessman and has been involved with government for years. Through his time in these affairs, he has learned some necessary and very important knowledge on how to succeed in different and sometimes challenging environments. He displays motivation in wanting to take the White House. After losing the GOP nomination in 2008, makes him want it just that much more. He wants to improve the United States and do things that he feels Obama is lacking to do. He has plans, that if elected, will jump start the government. The final attribute is personality. Romney has the personality that allows him to get the support and dollars of thousands, even millions of people. People can relate to him and the policies he wants. The next category is competencies. The first is problem-solving skills. As previously discussed, he sees a problem (one that just about every American sees) with the economy. He feels that he has the problem-solving skills necessary to get us back on track. Anyone who works in government needs to have social judgement skills. He understands people, what they want and what they are looking for. He needs to be able to work with people domestically and internationally to be effective and get things done. Once again, he has been known to bring failing business back to life. He has the knowledge to implement the appropriate systems. While the entire economy is very different than one single business, it is certainly a nice base to have. The final category is leadership outcomes. In this category there is effective problem solving and performance. Romney has proven he can solve problems in effective ways, just not at the same scale as the US economy. His performance shows that he has done the right things and knows the right people to make an initial run at the White House. Once the race really hearts up we will see how his performance really measures up.
Posted by: Jason Svela
Mitt Romney is making his case for a second run at the White House after falling short in 2008 to gain the GOP nomination. The leadership theory I am using to analyze this article is the Skills approach. Romney has developed numerous skills through his years as a businessman that he thinks will be beneficial to help give the economy the jump start it needs. As stated in the article, he has a knack for turning around things that are failing. The skills model starts with individual attributes. The first attribute to look at is general cognitive ability. Romney has not gotten to this point in his life without having intelligence. He is a businessman and has been involved with government for years. Through his time in these affairs, he has learned some necessary and very important knowledge on how to succeed in different and sometimes challenging environments. He displays motivation in wanting to take the White House. After losing the GOP nomination in 2008, makes him want it just that much more. He wants to improve the United States and do things that he feels Obama is lacking to do. He has plans, that if elected, will jump start the government. The final attribute is personality. Romney has the personality that allows him to get the support and dollars of thousands, even millions of people. People can relate to him and the policies he wants. The next category is competencies. The first is problem-solving skills. As previously discussed, he sees a problem (one that just about every American sees) with the economy. He feels that he has the problem-solving skills necessary to get us back on track. Anyone who works in government needs to have social judgement skills. He understands people, what they want and what they are looking for. He needs to be able to work with people domestically and internationally to be effective and get things done. Once again, he has been known to bring failing business back to life. He has the knowledge to implement the appropriate systems. While the entire economy is very different than one single business, it is certainly a nice base to have. The final category is leadership outcomes. In this category there is effective problem solving and performance. Romney has proven he can solve problems in effective ways, just not at the same scale as the US economy. His performance shows that he has done the right things and knows the right people to make an initial run at the White House. Once the race really hearts up we will see how his performance really measures up.
Posted by: Jason Svela
CEO Larry Page's Early Mistake
http://blogs.forbes.com/stevedenning/2011/04/09/google-larry-pages-first-blunder-spam-grandma-for-cash/
Google’s new CEO Larry Page isn’t waiting to make waves in his new position. This Forbes article by Steve Denning discusses how Page “accidentally” sent out a companywide memo talking about how 25% of bonuses will be tied to innovations that are more social-network-like. However, the article states also that although Page leaked the memo to every Google employee, only a small portion of whom actually work on social innovations. The article goes on to discuss how maybe it was Page’s way of telling employees the focus of their new direction – social media. Page wants employees to get others, family, friends, etc., to like and adapt whatever social products they offer.
Is Page making rookie mistakes or is he trying to be sneaky, getting social media on the brain of employees? The article goes on to criticize how Page is using extrinsic rewards to get what he wants, which is something creative and innovative.
In this case, Page is a great example of someone who is not displaying transformational leadership. Instead of inspiring and motivating his employees by being a strong role model, he is sending companywide bonus-threatening memos about how Google needs to find the next Facebook. I would describe Larry Page as more of a skills model leader. He is a cofounder of Google and has been waiting, practicing, preparing for his run as CEO for ten years. He has developed the skills that he needs, but this unprofessional example may leave doubt in the minds of Google employees. The article also hints that Page is stressed about coming up with something to rival Facebook (what they call “yesterday’s next big thing”), instead of looking to the future and focusing on what Google users want.
Posted by Samantha Wilson
Milk poisoning in northwest China 'deliberate'
The article talked about how in China, they had two dairies that sent out tainted milk which ended up killing 3 children and making many more of them sick, most of them under the age of two. The sad part it they say it was deliberate and was intended to cause harm to those who drank it. But they do have some suspects in custody in connection with the poisoning. And this made me think of the ethical duty that the Chinese farmers owe to their customers, as well as the people of china to make sure they keep their reputation from slipping. Not only should they make sure they have safe products to make sure they do not face consequences for their negligence. But also they should feel some duty to not hurt people because it is the right thing to do especially when they trust that milk will be safe to feed to their children. They have let unethical people into the production of their necessities, and now the government needs to help restore faith in the Chinese food production.
Any other theories that apply?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13036943
Posted by-Greg Pawlowski
Any other theories that apply?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13036943
Posted by-Greg Pawlowski
The Daily Show with Stephen Colbert
John Stewart and Stephen Colbert could be considered only as comedians and nothing more. However, they have a huge following, not only from people watching their shows, but also from people attending their Rally to Restore Sanity. This rally was held last fall in Washington DC where many partisan rallies are also held. The aim of the Rally to Restore Sanity was to show that there are more people who are in the middle than the number of people who are extreme conservatives, liberals, etc. and we should all work together to solve the problems that we are facing instead of bashing each other.
The leadership approach that Colbert and Stewart are possessing in this situation is Transformational Leadership. You could also argue for Authentic Leadership, but the nature of their shows and the rally would make that difficult as they are normally “in character” when they are in public. They are concerned with the values and emotions that their followers have and are trying to influence them in such a way that they develop into something better than what they currently are. They are also trying to get non-followers to follow them to see the benefits of working together.
It is also apparent that they both possess charisma. If this was not true, they would not have such a large following and so many people would not have showed up to the rally if they did not possess this quality.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/10/31/avlon.rally.sanity/index.html?iref=allsearch
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/10/31/avlon.rally.sanity/index.html?iref=allsearch
Liz Higgins
Monday, March 21, 2011
FIFA Presidental Candidate: Mohamed Bin Hammam
Recently, FIFA, International Federation of Association Football has received criticism for the recent World Cup location picks for 2018 and 2022. Russia will host the World Cup for 2018 and Qatar will host the World Cup in 2022. FIFA presidential candidate, Mohamed Bin Hammam, wants to reestablish credibility FIFA has seemed to have lost from its recent picks. Hamman wants to use Authentic Leadership to reestablish the credibility of FIFA.
In reference to the Authentic Leadership Characteristics model on page 212 of the textbook, Hamman has established the passion of wanting to have a stronger relationship with football fans. He has a purpose for wanting to reconnect with what football fans want. Hamman's behavior is wanting to be open and logical about updating the process of selecting the future locations of the World Cup. Hamman said, "We are friends and not enemies. We need a common understanding - our interests are all the same." For the connectedness part of the model, Hamman wants to have a stronger relationship with the fans and get their feedback for locations. Hamman commented that future bidding processes have to be transparent so that the public can know precisely what is going on. If Hamman reaches the position of FIFA's president, he will have to remain self-discipline and consistent under stressful situations dealing with this process of deciding World Cup locations. Hamman has demonstrated his compassion for the situation. He had commented that FIFA belongs to the people-acting on behalf of them.
Question: Is Authentic Leadership the best style in this case?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9431704.stm
Posted by: Aaron Barton
In reference to the Authentic Leadership Characteristics model on page 212 of the textbook, Hamman has established the passion of wanting to have a stronger relationship with football fans. He has a purpose for wanting to reconnect with what football fans want. Hamman's behavior is wanting to be open and logical about updating the process of selecting the future locations of the World Cup. Hamman said, "We are friends and not enemies. We need a common understanding - our interests are all the same." For the connectedness part of the model, Hamman wants to have a stronger relationship with the fans and get their feedback for locations. Hamman commented that future bidding processes have to be transparent so that the public can know precisely what is going on. If Hamman reaches the position of FIFA's president, he will have to remain self-discipline and consistent under stressful situations dealing with this process of deciding World Cup locations. Hamman has demonstrated his compassion for the situation. He had commented that FIFA belongs to the people-acting on behalf of them.
Question: Is Authentic Leadership the best style in this case?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9431704.stm
Posted by: Aaron Barton
CEOs say how you treat a waiter can predict a lot about character
This was a good article that like the title suggests, the way a person treats a member of the waiting staff or hotel clerk for example can describe their character and personal traits. CEO's look at these interactions when they are evaluating a person for promotion or another employee/CEO. This would be a good example of CEO's looking into the traits that perspective ceo's exhibit and how these traits will carry over into the running's of the business. They look at traits like the ones we discussed in the book such as Nuerotocism, Extroversion, and openess to name a few. Those gave light to the fact that you need to ""Watch out for people who have a situational value system, who can turn the charm on and off depending on the status of the person they are interacting with," Swanson writes. "Be especially wary of those who are rude to people perceived to be in subordinate roles."" Again showing that these simple interactions can predict how they will react in a stressful situation such as a tough negotiation session. Or as mentioned in the article a CEO would only order food through his assitant, which to the other CEO's was takn as he could not get things accomplished with out " hand holding from their support staff". So table etiquette is not only of concern to new college hirees at dinner interviews but also applies all the way up to the CEO.
Questions to think about?
1. What could be said about your personal manners towards wait satff? And do you think that it coincides along with article?
2. What other theories that we talked about could be applied other than trait?
http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2006-04-14-ceos-waiter-rule_x.htm
Posted by- Greg Pawlowski
Questions to think about?
1. What could be said about your personal manners towards wait satff? And do you think that it coincides along with article?
2. What other theories that we talked about could be applied other than trait?
http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2006-04-14-ceos-waiter-rule_x.htm
Posted by- Greg Pawlowski
Barack Obama and Libya
I have tried to follow the current situation going on in Libya the past few days. I did not know that Obama decided to bomb Libya without Congress' blessing. While the President has this power, they often make sure they get it ok'd by Congress first. By making this decision himself, Obama showed that he has legitimate power. Obviously being the ruler of the free world he has legitimate power, but he went over the top of everyone in making the decision. While many people felt that bombing Libya over the weekend was necessary, others are upset that we got involved in another war and being the world's big brother. As discussed in our textbook, authentic leadership is often used in times of world upheavals and crisis. Obama felt that if he had to do something. The main argument against getting involved is, should we get involved in another overseas' civil war? We still have troops in the Middle East and are helping aid Japan every way we can. However, by Obama taking a stand and deciding to bomb Libya and help create the no-fly zone it shows that he is willing to take the steps needed to promote peace and equality world wide. By looking at the intrapersonal definition of authentic leadership there are several perspectives that Obama showed by taking action. First he exhibited genuine leadership. He lead with conviction. Lastly, he based his actions on his own values. This is who Obama is. He is not faking it, he genuinley cares for people and wants to protect the innocent from ruthless dictators. Also mentioned with authentic leadership are four key positive psychological attributes: confidence, hope, optimisim, and resilience. During all the troubling times we have faced while Obama has been in office, he has shown confidence, hope, optimisim, and resilience, and it was no different in this situation either. Whether you agree with taking military action in Libya, you have to realize that Obama has displayed exceptional authentic leadership throughout his time in office.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110321/ts_yblog_theenvoy/international-alliance-divided-over-libya-command
Posted by Jason Svela
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110321/ts_yblog_theenvoy/international-alliance-divided-over-libya-command
Posted by Jason Svela
The moment nuclear plant chief WEPT
The article talks about how the Japanese have downplayed the severity of the problem at their reactors, and how the leaders have reacted to this situation raises some points related to class. I feel that this relates to the leader member exchange in that the Japanese and specifically the leader of Japan-Naoto Kan have not been as honest with the rest of the world as the perhaps should have. The rest of the world is like a out group compared to the Japanese and they have not received all the benefits of someone on the in-group, such as someone working for the Japanese government knows a lot more probably then what the Japanese have let out to the west. And if they would have been more up front with the rest of the world in the beginning, and say they need help with their reactors and cannot get them under control, then perhaps the response from the rest of the world would be a lot greater and some of the problems that we may be facing in the future could have been avoided with a better leader member exchange.
Some questions?
1. Does how a leader emotions appear in a crisis affect the country?
2. Is there a reason to keep other nations as an out group? And if so what circumstances?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367684/Japan-earthquake-tsunami-Fukushima-nulear-plant-radiation-leak-kill-people.html
Posted by- Greg Pawlowski
Some questions?
1. Does how a leader emotions appear in a crisis affect the country?
2. Is there a reason to keep other nations as an out group? And if so what circumstances?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367684/Japan-earthquake-tsunami-Fukushima-nulear-plant-radiation-leak-kill-people.html
Posted by- Greg Pawlowski
Tim Pawlenty: Authentic Leader
CNN article: http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/03/21/tim.pawlenty/index.html
In this article Kevin Bohn describes how Tim Pawlenty, former governor of Minnesota, started with a touching story and now may be on the road to presidency. Pawlenty lost his mother at a young age, and was faced with even more hard times when his father lost his job. Pawlenty worked several years in the produce department at a grocery store to support himself and family. Pawlenty tells the story of the obstacles he overcame as a kid, financially, and even politically with unions (Pawlenty won a fight on behalf of the unionized bus drivers in his state in 2004). He was also on the maybe list for McCain's Vice President candidates. Pawlenty has taken advantage of the struggles he's faced by turning them into an inspiring story of strength, intelligence and perserverance. This shows me one thing, that Pawlenty is genuine. He has victories to back up his story. His battle and victory against the unionized bus drivers shows his passion with a purpose. He is a real authentic leader. More specifically I believe he falls under the Intrapersonal category of authentic leadership. Using his self-knowledge, self-regulation, and self-concept, Pawlenty developed an authentic leadership style, beginning by fighting for causes he believed in. Pawlenty exhibits many qualities described in the intrapersonal authentic leadership perspective as well, mostly being a genuine leader. He also makes decisions in accordance with his values. He has strong opinions against abortion and same sex marriages that he spoke out about during his time as governor of Minnesota.
Posted by Sammy Wilson
In this article Kevin Bohn describes how Tim Pawlenty, former governor of Minnesota, started with a touching story and now may be on the road to presidency. Pawlenty lost his mother at a young age, and was faced with even more hard times when his father lost his job. Pawlenty worked several years in the produce department at a grocery store to support himself and family. Pawlenty tells the story of the obstacles he overcame as a kid, financially, and even politically with unions (Pawlenty won a fight on behalf of the unionized bus drivers in his state in 2004). He was also on the maybe list for McCain's Vice President candidates. Pawlenty has taken advantage of the struggles he's faced by turning them into an inspiring story of strength, intelligence and perserverance. This shows me one thing, that Pawlenty is genuine. He has victories to back up his story. His battle and victory against the unionized bus drivers shows his passion with a purpose. He is a real authentic leader. More specifically I believe he falls under the Intrapersonal category of authentic leadership. Using his self-knowledge, self-regulation, and self-concept, Pawlenty developed an authentic leadership style, beginning by fighting for causes he believed in. Pawlenty exhibits many qualities described in the intrapersonal authentic leadership perspective as well, mostly being a genuine leader. He also makes decisions in accordance with his values. He has strong opinions against abortion and same sex marriages that he spoke out about during his time as governor of Minnesota.
Posted by Sammy Wilson
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Geoffrey Canada and HCZ
Geoffrey Canada is most well known for his work in Harlem with the Harlem Children’s Zone (HCZ) and education reform in the US. Recently, Mark Zuckerberg donated $1 million to the education system of New Jersey and Canada was present when the donation was made and involved in the discussions before it was made. Canada is passionate about improving the lives of everyone by getting them through school and into higher education. He seems to be using Transformational Leadership in most of his endeavors. Transformational leadership is when the leader “engages with others and creates a connection that raises the level of motivation and morality in both the leader and the follower.” Canada is most concerned with those benefitting from the HCZ and those would be considered his followers. You could also argue that he uses Path-Goal theory in his leadership of the organization. HCZ is based on the students and families of the student’s success in the programs. Canada helps to remove and get around the obstacles that have arisen that have attributed those in the program to get to where they are.
Liz Higgins
Arne Duncan and the U.S. School System
Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education, and school faculty are utilizing team leadership to transform the American Public School System. Recently, the United States has fallen to 10th in the world for education. With the United States currently being the best country in the world, 10th in the world is not good.
In Hill’s Model of Team Leadership, Duncan realizes the leadership decision of taking action should take place in order to transform the American Public School System. In Internal Leadership Actions, Duncan thinks all school principals need to be trained to act like CEOs. They should possess the skills that are mentioned in the skills approach of leadership. Principals should have human and conceptual skills. For human skills, principals should be able to communicate well with other faculty and students. For conceptual skills, principals should be able to develop ideas and be able to look at what is best for the big picture of the school. According to Duncan, if the realm of business were to be combined with education it will greatly improve the overall performance and effectiveness of U.S. education. Each principal is the leader of their school. Duncan was quoted, "We have to treat them as such, and we have to train them as such.” Duncan acknowledges this will require action from all school districts in the U.S. and be a team effort.
In Hill’s Model of Team Leadership, Duncan realizes the leadership decision of taking action should take place in order to transform the American Public School System. In Internal Leadership Actions, Duncan thinks all school principals need to be trained to act like CEOs. They should possess the skills that are mentioned in the skills approach of leadership. Principals should have human and conceptual skills. For human skills, principals should be able to communicate well with other faculty and students. For conceptual skills, principals should be able to develop ideas and be able to look at what is best for the big picture of the school. According to Duncan, if the realm of business were to be combined with education it will greatly improve the overall performance and effectiveness of U.S. education. Each principal is the leader of their school. Duncan was quoted, "We have to treat them as such, and we have to train them as such.” Duncan acknowledges this will require action from all school districts in the U.S. and be a team effort.
Question: Do you think there is another leadership approach that would fit better for Duncan?
http://www.usnews.com/news/best-leaders/articles/2009/12/04/education-secretary-arne-duncan-says-school-principals-must-act-like-ceos
Posted by: Aaron Barton
http://www.usnews.com/news/best-leaders/articles/2009/12/04/education-secretary-arne-duncan-says-school-principals-must-act-like-ceos
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Nokia Shake-Up
Nokia recently hired a new CEO, Stephen Elop, to help revive Nokia's presence in the cell phone industry. Nokia feels it is falling behind primarily in its smartphone department. Elop is in a highly directive state. He has very little supportive behavior for his employees. In the situational approach model developed by Blanchard, he is in the S1-D1 category. Elop is task-oriented by focusing on the objective to reestablish Nokia as a "challenger" in the smartphone industry. The communication from Elop to employees is always about the goal of developing the company to revive itself as being the number one in the smartphone industry. Elop is not being supportive because he is wanting to not try and give encourage the current employees to do better. He is looking to have immediate redeveloping of the company with new employees. Eventually, Elop may move into the S2-D2 category of coaching, but for right now, he is looking to redevelop the company to reach its full potential.
Questions: Do you think it is wise for Stephen Elop to be in such a directive mode at this point? Do you think he should be in a different mode (either S2-D2, S3-D3, or S4-D4)?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576128531221475772.html?mod=WSJ_mgmt_LeftTopNews
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Questions: Do you think it is wise for Stephen Elop to be in such a directive mode at this point? Do you think he should be in a different mode (either S2-D2, S3-D3, or S4-D4)?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576128531221475772.html?mod=WSJ_mgmt_LeftTopNews
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Executives car predict their personality?
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-12-10-ceo-cars_N.htm
This article looked at the types of cars that various CEO's drove and then it compared them to their management styles and relates it to some of their traits. For example "Thayer, CEO of health care facilities operator I-trax (DMX) , tools around in an '86 F-250 pickup that may be worth $2,000, but only because he takes such meticulous care of it. "Early in my career I learned to maintain plant and equipment," he says. He refuses to trade in the truck, and hopes that reinforces to his 2,000 employees in 31 states his commitment to frugal resource management."" This gives light to the fact that skills, traits, and values used in younger years of CEO's can transfer to the later years as they progress up the ladder and need more leadership skills.
It also conveys to the employees of the company what the CEO stands for, whether he drives a Eco-friendly car and promotes stability within his company to CEO's that drive flashy sports car that show the employees the CEO is at the top and he runs the company his way. The Expensive cars could be looked as a motivating factor to their employees to show what is possible with their company. It is interesting because most people think of Executives as driving black Mercedez but the color and make will say a lot about the Executive especially when they can drive any car they wanted.
Questions?
What other chracteristics would a car divulge about a CEO?
What other CEO perks can motivate their employees?
Posted- Greg Pawlowski
This article looked at the types of cars that various CEO's drove and then it compared them to their management styles and relates it to some of their traits. For example "Thayer, CEO of health care facilities operator I-trax (DMX) , tools around in an '86 F-250 pickup that may be worth $2,000, but only because he takes such meticulous care of it. "Early in my career I learned to maintain plant and equipment," he says. He refuses to trade in the truck, and hopes that reinforces to his 2,000 employees in 31 states his commitment to frugal resource management."" This gives light to the fact that skills, traits, and values used in younger years of CEO's can transfer to the later years as they progress up the ladder and need more leadership skills.
It also conveys to the employees of the company what the CEO stands for, whether he drives a Eco-friendly car and promotes stability within his company to CEO's that drive flashy sports car that show the employees the CEO is at the top and he runs the company his way. The Expensive cars could be looked as a motivating factor to their employees to show what is possible with their company. It is interesting because most people think of Executives as driving black Mercedez but the color and make will say a lot about the Executive especially when they can drive any car they wanted.
Questions?
What other chracteristics would a car divulge about a CEO?
What other CEO perks can motivate their employees?
Posted- Greg Pawlowski
NBC Spotlights Celebrity Causes
NBC Specials Promote Celebs Causes:
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/smallscreen/news/article_1511239.php/NBC-Making-a-Difference-sees-Alicia-Keys-Halle-Berry-and-Glenn-Close-Nov-9
In this article by April MacIntyre we see how NBC is helping several stars promote their causes. Aside from these celebs, the show introduces ordinary people who are doing extraordinary things. NBC, instead of having one leader lead this promotion, is promoting change and outreach as a whole. The article talks about how Jon Bon Jovi, Alicia Keys, Halle Berry and other celebs are working toward change and awareness. Their actions target things from poverty to helping with Katrina recovery. This attitude NBC is putting out there reminds me of the contingency theory of leadership we covered in class. Each challenge (poverty, hunger, disaster relief, domestic violence, etc.) requires different leadership styles. Disaster relief may focus a lot more on building relationships and helping out in any way. Things like hunger and poverty require more task-oriented solutions, things that will put up numbers for the people in need. Halle Berry is also mentioned in the article. Her cause deals with helping victims of domestic abuse. Things like this require more difficult leader action as the task structure is not always high. However, the position power is good, as the members can really trust the leader, since she made a point to help organization and support the cause in the first place. It depends a lot on the situation from person to person. A big help for all of these celebs is the position power. They aren?t in the position to necessarily punish anyone, but have the funding to reward people and organizations monetarily.
Posted by Samantha Wilson
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/smallscreen/news/article_1511239.php/NBC-Making-a-Difference-sees-Alicia-Keys-Halle-Berry-and-Glenn-Close-Nov-9
In this article by April MacIntyre we see how NBC is helping several stars promote their causes. Aside from these celebs, the show introduces ordinary people who are doing extraordinary things. NBC, instead of having one leader lead this promotion, is promoting change and outreach as a whole. The article talks about how Jon Bon Jovi, Alicia Keys, Halle Berry and other celebs are working toward change and awareness. Their actions target things from poverty to helping with Katrina recovery. This attitude NBC is putting out there reminds me of the contingency theory of leadership we covered in class. Each challenge (poverty, hunger, disaster relief, domestic violence, etc.) requires different leadership styles. Disaster relief may focus a lot more on building relationships and helping out in any way. Things like hunger and poverty require more task-oriented solutions, things that will put up numbers for the people in need. Halle Berry is also mentioned in the article. Her cause deals with helping victims of domestic abuse. Things like this require more difficult leader action as the task structure is not always high. However, the position power is good, as the members can really trust the leader, since she made a point to help organization and support the cause in the first place. It depends a lot on the situation from person to person. A big help for all of these celebs is the position power. They aren?t in the position to necessarily punish anyone, but have the funding to reward people and organizations monetarily.
Posted by Samantha Wilson
DeSean Jackson
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=6120346
I initially read about this story on Yahoo the day DeSean was on The View. I then came across this story on ESPN. A will give a little background info on the story first. A 13 year old kid, Nadin Khoury, was the new kid in school. While walking home one day a group of older kids ambushed him and beat him up very badly. The whole thing was caught on tape and published on the web (YouTube I believe). Once it was published, his mom and Nadin went public with the story. Not long after that they got a call to be on The View to discuss the situation and talk about bullying in schools. While on The View they discussed what happened and showed the video. The people on The View got word that Nadin is a huge Philadelphia Eagles fan and Desean is his favorite player. So the day before Nadin was scheduled to be on the show, they called DeSean to see if he would be interested in coming on the show as a surprise. Without hesitation DeSean flew from LA to New York to be on the show and show his support. DeSean grew up in in South Central LA so he knows all too much about bullying. DeSean is now setting up a foundation to help stop bullying in schools. DeSean is a transformational leader because he used people's emotions, values, and ethics to connect with them. After watching the clip of The View many people were moved to do more than what they would normally do on an average day. They felt compelled to do something they would not usually do. DeSean is connected with the ichoose2live foundation. By going on The View and expressing what it is like to be bullied and what we as human beings need to do to stop this, he helped open people's eyes. He took on this task on a national stage, which can be often difficult, but with topics like this it is very hard to ignore. DeSean used inspirational motivation which the leader inspires their followers through motivation to be committed to a cause. He used emotions to appeal to those who tuned in to that episode. As DeSean came on The View just about every on stage began to cry. People were very emotional at this point. As DeSean sat next to Nadin, DeSean took his jersey off his back, signed it, and gave it to Nadin. He also got Nadin tickets to Eagles games next year, Philadelphia 76ers games, memorabilia, and his own cell phone number in case Nadin ever needed someone to talk to. While the cause was for a good reason, DeSean definetly pulled on people's heartstrings to make a difference in their community and to people everywhere. By promoting ichoose2live on both the show and on his Twitter account he gave his "followers" the resources needed to do something should they choose to. Overall, DeSean used emotions to get his point across on a subject that really needs to be addressed because millions of kids are bullied and unless people do something to stop it, bullying will never stop. Do you think that transformational leadership and pulling on people's hearstrings is really an effective way to get things accomplished in most instances?
Posted by Jason Svela
I initially read about this story on Yahoo the day DeSean was on The View. I then came across this story on ESPN. A will give a little background info on the story first. A 13 year old kid, Nadin Khoury, was the new kid in school. While walking home one day a group of older kids ambushed him and beat him up very badly. The whole thing was caught on tape and published on the web (YouTube I believe). Once it was published, his mom and Nadin went public with the story. Not long after that they got a call to be on The View to discuss the situation and talk about bullying in schools. While on The View they discussed what happened and showed the video. The people on The View got word that Nadin is a huge Philadelphia Eagles fan and Desean is his favorite player. So the day before Nadin was scheduled to be on the show, they called DeSean to see if he would be interested in coming on the show as a surprise. Without hesitation DeSean flew from LA to New York to be on the show and show his support. DeSean grew up in in South Central LA so he knows all too much about bullying. DeSean is now setting up a foundation to help stop bullying in schools. DeSean is a transformational leader because he used people's emotions, values, and ethics to connect with them. After watching the clip of The View many people were moved to do more than what they would normally do on an average day. They felt compelled to do something they would not usually do. DeSean is connected with the ichoose2live foundation. By going on The View and expressing what it is like to be bullied and what we as human beings need to do to stop this, he helped open people's eyes. He took on this task on a national stage, which can be often difficult, but with topics like this it is very hard to ignore. DeSean used inspirational motivation which the leader inspires their followers through motivation to be committed to a cause. He used emotions to appeal to those who tuned in to that episode. As DeSean came on The View just about every on stage began to cry. People were very emotional at this point. As DeSean sat next to Nadin, DeSean took his jersey off his back, signed it, and gave it to Nadin. He also got Nadin tickets to Eagles games next year, Philadelphia 76ers games, memorabilia, and his own cell phone number in case Nadin ever needed someone to talk to. While the cause was for a good reason, DeSean definetly pulled on people's heartstrings to make a difference in their community and to people everywhere. By promoting ichoose2live on both the show and on his Twitter account he gave his "followers" the resources needed to do something should they choose to. Overall, DeSean used emotions to get his point across on a subject that really needs to be addressed because millions of kids are bullied and unless people do something to stop it, bullying will never stop. Do you think that transformational leadership and pulling on people's hearstrings is really an effective way to get things accomplished in most instances?
Posted by Jason Svela
Sunday, February 13, 2011
U.N. Goodwill Ambassadors: Don Cheadle & Edward Norton
NPR Article: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130051063
To go along with part of our blog’s theme this article is a good example of celebs being influential in a positive way. The article is about Don Cheadle & Edward Norton, who are serving as U.N. goodwill ambassadors. I found it interesting as I didn’t even know this sort of position existed. Among a few other celebs like Angelina Jolie, these ambassadors make trips to places in need and help in several ways.
Recently Don Cheadle went to Rwanda. A lot of the focus here was on environmental problems. He was trying to raise awareness in places that don’t take action to preserve the environment. This is only one example of a cause the U.N. goodwill ambassadors tackle.
This ambassador position immediately made me think of what we learned about in the trait approach. For one, Cheadle shows sociability. Ambassadors are there for a reason, to maintain smooth relationships. Just like it says in the book, Cheadle is a perfect example of someone acting “friendly, outgoing, courteous, tactful, and diplomatic.” Along with this, we can see his level of extraversion. This entire group of ambassadors is meant to do good things, and Cheadle wouldn’t be able to do so if he was negative and shy. Personally, I think visiting Rwanda would certainly take me out of my comfort zone. These are just to name a few, but Cheadle has several traits we discussed in chapter 2.
Now Don Cheadle seems like a good guy, but the question is are some celebs doing this because they care or because it looks good? It’s hard not to question their motive, remembering their ‘any press is good press’ celebrity attitude.
Sammy Wilson
To go along with part of our blog’s theme this article is a good example of celebs being influential in a positive way. The article is about Don Cheadle & Edward Norton, who are serving as U.N. goodwill ambassadors. I found it interesting as I didn’t even know this sort of position existed. Among a few other celebs like Angelina Jolie, these ambassadors make trips to places in need and help in several ways.
Recently Don Cheadle went to Rwanda. A lot of the focus here was on environmental problems. He was trying to raise awareness in places that don’t take action to preserve the environment. This is only one example of a cause the U.N. goodwill ambassadors tackle.
This ambassador position immediately made me think of what we learned about in the trait approach. For one, Cheadle shows sociability. Ambassadors are there for a reason, to maintain smooth relationships. Just like it says in the book, Cheadle is a perfect example of someone acting “friendly, outgoing, courteous, tactful, and diplomatic.” Along with this, we can see his level of extraversion. This entire group of ambassadors is meant to do good things, and Cheadle wouldn’t be able to do so if he was negative and shy. Personally, I think visiting Rwanda would certainly take me out of my comfort zone. These are just to name a few, but Cheadle has several traits we discussed in chapter 2.
Now Don Cheadle seems like a good guy, but the question is are some celebs doing this because they care or because it looks good? It’s hard not to question their motive, remembering their ‘any press is good press’ celebrity attitude.
Sammy Wilson
Saturday, February 12, 2011
PostSecret
Most everyone has heard of Frank Warren, or at least his website PostSecret. Frank started PostSecret as an art project and social experiment in 2005. After the experiment was over, people continued to send in their secrets to Warren and he started the PostSecret website. Through his influence because of the popularity of the site, Frank has increased awareness of suicide prevention and Hopeline.
The people who are regular viewers of the PostSecret site perceive Frank as having expert power. The many events that he speaks at would prove that he has obtained a very large number of followers, simply for putting post cards on a website. I think this definitely shows his leadership abilities to establish a direction, align people, and motivate and inspire people (all of which are leadership qualities according to Kotter.)
Frank has started a movement of acceptance.
Whether or not everyone is aware of this phenomenon, it is something that has changed the lives of many people. Below is a link to a video that shows secrets and excerpts of Frank speaking at an event.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWqtwzEfRKY
Liz Higgins
The people who are regular viewers of the PostSecret site perceive Frank as having expert power. The many events that he speaks at would prove that he has obtained a very large number of followers, simply for putting post cards on a website. I think this definitely shows his leadership abilities to establish a direction, align people, and motivate and inspire people (all of which are leadership qualities according to Kotter.)
Frank has started a movement of acceptance.
Whether or not everyone is aware of this phenomenon, it is something that has changed the lives of many people. Below is a link to a video that shows secrets and excerpts of Frank speaking at an event.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWqtwzEfRKY
Liz Higgins
Friday, February 11, 2011
Living on the Edge (MQM 382-02 T3): Wael Ghonim
I think He is still representing the company, for a couple of reasons. First they hired him in the first place so they obviously felt his character was up to the standards to be with google and an executive on top of that. Second politically I am pretty sure they have to say that otherwise there will be hella backlash. He used his skills that he learned there to motivate all these people and lead about a revolution, he now is the face of the revolution I feel. Especially with all the news media outlets that convey him as the leader of the initial resisitance. He says he would die for the cause so I'm saying he is as a devoted leader as they come.Because of his position before the revolution he will always be a face of google in my mind.
-Greg Pawlowski
Living on the Edge (MQM 382-02 T3): Wael Ghonim: "WSJ Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576136323073589858.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories I was reading t..."
-Greg Pawlowski
Living on the Edge (MQM 382-02 T3): Wael Ghonim: "WSJ Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576136323073589858.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories I was reading t..."
Wael Ghonim
WSJ Article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576136323073589858.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
I was reading the Wall Street Journal yesterday and I found this article about Wael Ghonim. Wael Ghonim is Google's Mideast regional marketing executive. He helped organize the rebellion in Egypt against President Mumbarak. While in Egypt, Ghonim used the skills approach and what he learned at Google to influence protesters. For example, Ghonim administered Web pages to serve as a rallying point for protesters.
Google stated Wael Ghonim is on leave from Google during his activism in Egypt and whatever Mr. Ghonim does in his free time is his choice; he is acting on his on accord and is not an agent of the company.
Question: Is Wael Ghonim still representing the company even though Google claims he is acting on his own accord? Why or why not?
Posted by: Aaron Barton
I was reading the Wall Street Journal yesterday and I found this article about Wael Ghonim. Wael Ghonim is Google's Mideast regional marketing executive. He helped organize the rebellion in Egypt against President Mumbarak. While in Egypt, Ghonim used the skills approach and what he learned at Google to influence protesters. For example, Ghonim administered Web pages to serve as a rallying point for protesters.
Google stated Wael Ghonim is on leave from Google during his activism in Egypt and whatever Mr. Ghonim does in his free time is his choice; he is acting on his on accord and is not an agent of the company.
Question: Is Wael Ghonim still representing the company even though Google claims he is acting on his own accord? Why or why not?
Posted by: Aaron Barton
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Yvon Chouinard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3TwULu-Wjw
I recently watched this video for another class. I had never heard of Yvon Chouinard or his clothing company "Patagonia". Upon watching this video I was quite taken aback. Patagonia is a company that is doing everything they can to help our environment. Yvon says that we need to "consume less, but consume better". For example, instead of buying a coat for each season, buy just one that works for all seasons. Their products use organic cotton rather than cotton that has been enhanced by chemicals, which may be a bit more expensive, but is much better in the long run. Their entire parking lot is covered with solar panels which produces enough power to run two buildings in their campus. They recycle everything they use and even turn used water bottles into polyester products for their clothing. Yvon has shown that he is very innovative and eco-conscious. He cares about himself and every last stakeholder. The most staggering thing I learned about the company was that they are involved in a project called "1% for the Planet". They give 1% of their sales (not just revenue left over after expenses) to environmental NGO's to, obviously, help the planet. Yvon Chouinard is a leader who is helping protect and better our environment for us now and for future generations. He is very confident in his company. He has developed his leadership skills over time. He began just as a person who loved nature. As time went on he discovered he wanted to make a difference in the world. As time passed, he has continued to innovate and do different things with his company. I am sure that as the world continues to change, his skills will need to be honed to better fit the needs of the company and the planet. My question is, why aren't more companies doing something like Yvon Chouinard and Patagonia to help our environment for the better?
Posted by Jason Svela
I recently watched this video for another class. I had never heard of Yvon Chouinard or his clothing company "Patagonia". Upon watching this video I was quite taken aback. Patagonia is a company that is doing everything they can to help our environment. Yvon says that we need to "consume less, but consume better". For example, instead of buying a coat for each season, buy just one that works for all seasons. Their products use organic cotton rather than cotton that has been enhanced by chemicals, which may be a bit more expensive, but is much better in the long run. Their entire parking lot is covered with solar panels which produces enough power to run two buildings in their campus. They recycle everything they use and even turn used water bottles into polyester products for their clothing. Yvon has shown that he is very innovative and eco-conscious. He cares about himself and every last stakeholder. The most staggering thing I learned about the company was that they are involved in a project called "1% for the Planet". They give 1% of their sales (not just revenue left over after expenses) to environmental NGO's to, obviously, help the planet. Yvon Chouinard is a leader who is helping protect and better our environment for us now and for future generations. He is very confident in his company. He has developed his leadership skills over time. He began just as a person who loved nature. As time went on he discovered he wanted to make a difference in the world. As time passed, he has continued to innovate and do different things with his company. I am sure that as the world continues to change, his skills will need to be honed to better fit the needs of the company and the planet. My question is, why aren't more companies doing something like Yvon Chouinard and Patagonia to help our environment for the better?
Posted by Jason Svela
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Celebrities and their opinions
I find it interesting that Barbra Bush is endorsing the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York. It would seem unpopular for her (and as the article states, her mother along with other republicans) to openly support same-sex marriage because of the GOP’s stance on not only marriage; but the don’t ask don’t tell rule in the military.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the legalization of same-sex marriage, I wonder if Barbara (or any of the wives/daughters of political figures) would make such a public statement had it not been for her father’s or even grandfather’s position.
Because of her political ties, people do pay more attention to her (and to any celebrity or immediate family of politicians) whether what she says is legitimate or not. Not just on the issue of same-sex marriage, but on any issues that are relevant to the American people; those with “celebrity” status use said status to get their opinions out.
I think if I had some sort of celebrity status, I would definitely use it to shed light on issues that I think are important. So my question is: should these people, who do not necessarily have any authority or specific forum to give their opinions, express their opinions in such an open manner simply because they can?
Liz Higgins
Monday, January 24, 2011
Team Info.
MQM 382-02 (Organizational Leadership)-Professor Sheep
Team Information:
Elizabeth Higgins:
- Senior in Organizational Leadership
- Hometown: Champaign, IL
- Hobbies: Music, Traveling, and Watching TV
Samantha Wilson
- Senior in Organizational Leadership/Minor: Economics
- Hometown: Mahomet, IL
- Hobbies: Music, Basketball, Football, TV shows, and Animals
Greg Pawlowski:
- Senior in Accounting & Organizational Leadership
- Hometown: Hampshire, IL
- Hobbies: Music, Cars, and Football
Jason Svela
- Senior in Business Administration
- Hometown: Rochelle, IL
- Hobbies: Watching & Playing Sports, TV shows, and Socializing
Aaron Barton
- Senior in Organizational Leadership
- Hometown: Bloomington/Normal, IL
- Hobbies: Chess, Baseball, and Watching TV
Our blog will discuss leaders, celebrities, and shapers of public opinion who impact society in a positive or negative way. We commit to value discussion and debate among fellow peers. We will value everyone's opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)